The Altantuya murder: snippets from The Times of UK PDF Print E-mail
Posted by admin
Thursday, 09 April 2009 17:36
Source: http://mt.m2day.org/2008/content/view/20406/84/
Image
Now that the court has delivered its verdict as to whether the two UTK officers are guilty of murdering Altantuya Shaariibuu, maybe we can flashback on just some of the things that The Times of UK wrote about the matter since the story first broke in late 2006. And why The Times of UK? Well, The Times of UK would not lie like how Malaysian Bloggers normally would.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
10 November 2006
An inquiry into the disappearance of a Mongolian model, who was apparently shot before her body was blown apart with explosives, was ordered by Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, the Malaysian Prime Minister, yesterday.
His intervention came after police held a prominent political analyst in connection with the case that has caused a sensation in the country. Abdul Razak Baginda, 46, a member of the World Economic Forum, is the fourth person to be remanded in custody in connection with the death of the 28-year-old Altantuya Shaariibuu, whose body was found on Monday. He is a member of the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies, a television political pundit in Malaysia, and is studying for a doctorate at Oxford.
The others held after Miss Shaariibuu’s body was found on wasteland near Shah Alam are a police chief inspector and two police lance corporals, one male and one female. Mr Badawi said he had told the inspector-general of police to “investigate the case thoroughly and properly through due process”.
It has been reported that Mr Baginda met Miss Shaariibuu in Mongolia two years ago and the two had a relationship. The girl’s father in Mongolia said he believed they were married and that Mr Baginda was the father of her baby son.
His arrest sent Malaysian society reeling. Unnamed politicians and intellectuals described him as a “good” and “affable” man to the Malaysian Star newspaper. One said that Mr Baginda had showered Miss Shaariibuu with diamonds and other jewellery and had deposited $30,000 in her bank account. They had been on holiday together to Europe and South Africa.
“The father of murdered model Altantuya Shaariibuu will come with the marriage certificate to prove that they were married. He will also bring his grandson to undergo DNA tests to prove he is Abdul Razak’s son,” Mongolia’s honorary consul, Syed Abdul Rahman Alhabshi, said.
18 June 2007
An adviser to Malaysia's Deputy Prime Minister ordered two police officers from an elite bodyguard unit to murder his beautiful Mongolian lover, a politically-charged murder trial heard today.
The remains of Altantuya Shaariibuu, a 28-year-old translator, part-time model, and unmarried mother of two from Mongolia, were found blown up by explosives in a jungle clearing near Kuala Lumpur late last year.
Abdul Razak Baginda, 47-year-old father of a teenage daughter, planned the murder, prosecutors said in what promises to be the most closely-followed trial in Malaysia for years. Mr Abdul Razak and the two police officers face the gallows if found guilty.
Mr Abdul Razak is alleged to have turned to the police officers – from a unit charged with protecting Malaysia's leaders - after Miss Shaariibuu began blackmailing him when their relationship turned sour.
He was well known in Kuala Lumpur as a high-flier close to the ruling party and a friend of Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak, who has been forced to deny any knowledge of the case.
The trial, which has already been postponed in controversial circumstances, is being widely seen as a test case for a judicial system, which has often been criticised in the past as vulnerable to political interference.
Tun Majid Tun Hamzah, for the prosecution, told the High Court in Shah Alam that Mr Abdul Razak abetted the police officers "in planning and giving instructions so that the deceased is killed." He denies the charge.
He said that the officers, Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri, 30, and Constable Sirul Azhar Umar, 35, carried out the killing and that Sirul had confessed. The two officers are charged with her murder.
After their arrest, Mr Azilah had led police to the clearing where Miss Shaariibuu’s remains were found.
Miss Shaariibuu had threatened Mr Abdul Razak's child unless Mr Abdul Razak paid her, the prosecutor said.
Mr Tun Majid said that a pathologist's report would show that the cause of death was 'probable blast-related injuries'. A pair of slippers found in Mr Sirul's house were stained with what DNA tests proved was Miss Shaariibuu's blood, he said.
The trial had been scheduled to start earlier this month but was postponed after the attorney general replaced the prosecutor after he was seen playing badminton with the judge.
Before the trial started it had become a political football, with former deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim calling for fairness and lamenting what he described as the failure of police to question Deputy Prime Minister Najib.
No evidence has emerged to link Mr Najib with the case and the Deputy Prime Minister issued a statement insisting that he had had no involvement with the dead woman.
Malaysia's judiciary has often been the subject of criticism. Nearly ten years ago Mr Anwar was himself dismissed by then premier Mahatir Mohammad and convicted of corruption and sodomy, a decision which was widely criticised abroad.
Mr Anwar has said that the judiciary and police are on trial in today's case, and Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi has pledged there will be no cover-up.
22 March 2009
A FRENCH arms company is at the centre of a deepening scandal involving the sale of three submarines, the murder of a beautiful Mongolian interpreter and the man most likely to become prime minister of Malaysia next month.
All three have been linked in a sensational sequence of revelations that has convinced many Malaysians that the woman was killed to silence her demands of a share in the rewards of the transaction.
The scandal exploded last week after the French newspaper Libération alleged that the submarines deal and the murder of Altantuya Shariibuu, 28, were connected.
A glamorous, cosmopolitan woman, Altantuya grew up in St Petersburg, spoke Russian, Chinese, Korean and English, moved in elite circles and has been dubbed “a Far Eastern Mata Hari”.
She became the mistress of a Malaysian political fixer and was allegedly trying to extort money from him at the time of her violent demise.
Two members of an elite Malaysian police unit that protects top politicians are on trial in Kuala Lumpur, accused of shooting her in the jungle and then blowing up her body with military explosives.
Azilah Hadri, 32, and Sirul Azhar Umar, 36, officers in the Special Branch, could go to the gallows if convicted of abducting and murdering Altantuya on October 19, 2006. A verdict is expected early next month.
Their trial is unfolding as Najib Razak, the country’s deputy prime minister, stands on the verge of taking over as premier after a ruling-party leadership election, due within days.
Najib was accused by a young opposition MP, Gobind Singh Deo, in parliament, of involvement in the murder. Deo was suspended by the Speaker for making the remark. The deputy prime minister has strongly denied any involvement.
Testimony in an earlier court case has established an intimate personal and financial connection between the dead woman and a close aide to Najib, who was minister of defence at the time of the submarine deal.
The aide, Abdul Razak Baginda, was acquitted by a court last November of being an accessory in the murder. He has since been working on a doctorate at Trinity College, Oxford.
Baginda admitted that the dead woman was his mistress for about a year and prosecutors said she had pestered him for money after their break-up.
Just before her death she arrived in Kuala Lumpur, accompanied by a Mongolian shaman, who was to put a curse on Baginda if he did not pay up.
Altantuya was dragged away from outside Baginda’s home by two Special Branch officers, but he was acquitted after maintaining that he never gave orders for her to be harmed.
The Libération exposé linking the murder to the shadowy world of arms contracts has embarrassed the French war-ship firm DCNS. Armaris, a firm now merged with DCNS, sold the three submarines to Malaysia in 2002 for £937m.
Attention has centred on why Armaris paid £107m to a Malaysian company called Perimekar in 2006.
Opposition leaders alleged in parliament that the payment was a “commission” for intermediaries and that Perimekar was secretly owned by Baginda. Najib replied that it was not a “commission” and that Perimekar was a “project services provider”.
Libération has alleged that Altantuya, who toured France with Baginda in a Ferrari, wining and dining at expensive restaurants, learnt of the payment. It said she was demanding $500,000 (£345,000).
DCNS has refused to comment. It is already the subject of a French judicial investigation into corrupt practices, thanks to a whistleblower who has detailed bribery and industrial espionage allegations.
Last week, efforts to contact Baginda, a self-styled political analyst, at his new home in Oxford were unsuccessful.
Najib has avoided public comment but his politically influential wife, Rosmah Mansor, told the French news agency AFP that she was “shocked” by attempts to link her husband and her to the case.
The Times is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Comments (37)Add Comment
...
written by truthvoice, April 09, 2009 17:44:11
The real villain behind the murder will be safer after these two cops died.
report abuse
disagree 8
agree 137
...
written by sydput, April 09, 2009 17:51:00
giving away contracts to political secretary is like insider trading.
Insider trading is a crime at the KLSE and other reputable stock exchange.
Shouldn't the MACC go after Najib based on this?
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 154
...
written by imanj, April 09, 2009 18:01:29
This verdict delivered today,death sentence given doesn't see the end but it's just the begining to the start of this gruesome killing of a human being..!!
We will see more than we have because,i believe the family members of the victim may never give up,until they know as to WHY she was killed..!!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 71
...
written by malaysianohope, April 09, 2009 18:11:27
Since Khairy is flicked he should have the balls to reveal NR's role in Altantuya's murder as claimed by Pete. What have you Khairy to lose but everything to gain if NR & Dotty are implicated?
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 95
...
written by Lembing, April 09, 2009 18:11:57
WHY is there NO religious prosecution on BAGINDA for having sex with a non-muslim and for having extra marital affairs???
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 172
...
written by Rumah Bersih, April 09, 2009 18:20:17
Dear Pete,
Razak excellent Ph.D subject would be how to collect hundreds of million, get some lady kill and then two trained police takes the blame all while writing Najis acceptance speech. Hope those evidence will be flowing to the public soon.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 67
...
written by mob1900, April 09, 2009 18:22:00
Najeeb Mongolia is tying up loose-ends by sending the 2 ex-UTKs to their deaths, the other loose-end will be Bala and the Baginda-fler, rest assured these 2 will not be 'enjoying their last moments', Najeeb Mongolia will make sure of that.
Heard there are lotsa' 'freak accidents' happening at Thailand and London lately.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 53
...
written by ahmadneil, April 09, 2009 18:47:37
I think these 2 murderers should face thr people's court and see if we are allowed to ask questions.A lot of questions are left unanswered .
We must answer these questions...
1,why was Altantuya immigration records deleted.
2,why was Najib not call as witness.
4,where is Altantuya passport.
5,why the court didn't ask the french gov't for immigration records of Altantuya ,Baginda and Najis.
6,why didn't the prosecution ask these 2 bodyguards who is paying them to kill Altantuya.
7,why was that photo showing Altantuya ,Baginda and Najis not use as evidence.
8,why did the prosecution check and get informations about hotels were Najis ,Baginda and Altantuya are staying.
9,why are the ticketing companies that issue air tickets not been call to produce copies of their tickets.
10,why aren't that taxi driver who drove Altantuya to Razak house not call to he witness.
11, why was that SMS between Najis and Shapee A. not fully investigated.
get all this answered.
report abuse
disagree 2
agree 126
...
written by SCOng, April 09, 2009 18:47:42
Just wondering why nothing was mentioned about that "Perimekar" Company?
Should have some kind of audit then reveal the background of that company.
The MACC seems to be not doing anything, none of the MP pressing for this action?
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 52
...
written by hellosunshine, April 09, 2009 18:50:27
So many questions left unanswered.
Where the fark is Bala?
Who ordered these 2 hitmen to kill since they did not have the motive?
C4 is from the army, how did they get it?
Why didn't the police follow up the leads on Najis' involvement?
Why didn't ACA (MACC) investigate the 'commission' from the arms deal?
So many questions more........... smilies/tongue.gif
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 52
...
written by educationist, April 09, 2009 18:50:38
Thanks Pete, but I'll give this a pass.
Unless some new incriminating evidence surfaces he/she/they that ordered the killing will be roaming the corridors of power.
So, might as well let the sleeping dog lie.
report abuse
disagree 15
agree 10
...
written by Fuminari, April 09, 2009 18:52:21
kera jahat,u know where u are now!u must rally for najis to sue 'times','the liberations','the new york times','the nation' n 'jakarta post' etc etc etc!!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 16
...
written by Remo, April 09, 2009 19:01:03
What ever the cabinet line up is I am not bothered.
What about Perak?
When are we going to have the SNAP election to decide who should rule Perak.
No point going to the court its all bias.
Leave it to the Rakyat to decide.
No one else can solve this problem.
i hope the newly appointed PM will do this soon.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 22
...
written by wongnoball, April 09, 2009 19:02:25
Well, The Times of UK would not lie like how Malaysian Bloggers normally would. smilies/cheesy.gif smilies/grin.gif smilies/cheesy.gif smilies/grin.gif
Actually lots of people have evidence but what use of it if the Court of Law have Judges that will Pervert the Cause of Justice. Go ask Marina Yussof ...she had ample evidence on the Bank Bumi Scandal and who was involved from Tun Daim, Tun Munafik-Botox and possible who ordered the murder. If Malaysia can be hood winked into this Natural Death of Kugan. This murder case also another swept under carpet. Does anyone from the Royalty Really care?? Rakyat can only hope for DAP, PAS, PKR to continue the struggle for Malaysian. We are battling against those who can order GUNS, F-16, Tanks against rakyat hands and stones. Yet the eternal battle against Evil Must continue regardless of the Evil opposition. Remember they are Formidable but Never INVINCIBLE!! Do your little worst everyday to Hurt UMNO-BN cash flow and their cronies. Keep up the Anger Momentum....soon Rakyat will be BOSS Forever!!....To hell with the Myth of Sultan intervening for the Good of Malaysia....the sooner we bury this hope the quicker we can re-focus on the task ahead. UMNO-BN Total Obliteration.....please more UMNO-BN MP die for more by-election!!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 45
...
written by ahmadneil, April 09, 2009 19:03:35
Razak Baginda have sent words that he and his family are living happily in their new London mansion that was just been bought,costing close to 1.3 million pounds.They are ajusting to their new life in this foreign country and Razak is now studying for his doctorate,her daughter,Rotwellier is very aggressive these days and would often not sleep at night.She is finding it hard to accustom to life in this clod and hostile English weather. The room she slept is called Kennel and she often curdle up in her own blanket.
As for that Mrs Labrador,she is trying to get on with her life and she is very protective of her husband now ,since now she knew that Razak is screwing around with girls.Often they quarrel about Altantuya and she tends to get very jealous becos sometimes in the night,Razak will call Aminah's name instead of hers.
Most of the time Razak stays in his study room and often he won't even sleep with that Labrador.
Razak says that he will come back to Malaysia only after the news of Altantuya is long gone.He thank you all of the publicity generated and when he goes to Oxford,the girls will run away when they see this ET.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 42
...
written by AsamLaksa, April 09, 2009 19:27:47
The 'Mongolian woman' will not go away. In any respectable democracy, with so much baggage to his name, he must be very thick skin to take up the top job of the country. Is he a fool or what being unable to deal with this issue?
I mean they control the media. They control the police. All that they needed to do was to make a credible link to someone else and his name won't even be associated with it. But I think there were forces in play that wanted his name to be dragged in the mud and possibly rightly so. After all murder is most vile. Your guess is as good as mine as to how did they find out where the explosion site was. It was supposed to make her disappear. It did not. Someone talked.
Then when it came down to damage control, it was a pathetic attempt throughout. First of all he does not have the personality and character to easily wave off criticism like his former former boss who once called him a coward. A swearing on a holy book? Who's great idea was that?
Now not wanting further inquiry only makes things worse. BUt I don't blame him because he wasn't the head honcho yet and other forces may use the inquiry to derail his 'destiny'. Nevertheless, now he is head honcho it is more likely that a new inquiry be carried out because now he can control it, like previous a leader who was linked with judicial gerrymandering.
'That Mongolian woman' is here to stay. I wonder how the other world leaders would view Malaysia's new leader.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 27
...
written by Fido, April 09, 2009 19:38:05
Has anyone ever questioned why the faces of the 2 suspects ( now proven guilty) were always covered up. Why?
The only pictures we see in papers are caricatures. Why?
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 37
...
written by Jim Cheong, April 09, 2009 19:44:51
By snubbing KJ from the cabinet, it only proves one thing....KJ does not have anything linking Najis to the Mongolian
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 20
...
written by KotaDamansara73, April 09, 2009 19:53:45
Najeeb says:
"I did not kill Altantuya. It was the 2 police who was possesed by evil that killed Altantuya. I swear in my mother's grave that I did not kiss Altantuya. It was my close associate Bagindai who can't keep his penis in his pants that go and have anal intercourse with her. And that is why, she demanded USD500k."
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 11
...
written by binkah1, April 09, 2009 19:58:32
Time for the FBI and the world court to take action
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 22
...
written by Xpax, April 09, 2009 20:05:30
RPK,
Isn't it time for you to come out with prove since the case is officially ended today?
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 22
...
written by bknight, April 09, 2009 20:16:55
it is time to rally the mongolian gov and setev sharriibuu to file this case in ICC.
it is crime against humanity!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 16
...
written by V4Vigilante, April 09, 2009 20:17:46
For fark's sake!, a Mongolian lady has been killed, someone guilty(?) is still farking free out there in U.K. and the prime person has just taken over the country's leadership (MY COCK!)and 2 bloody scapegoats (with faces covered) will be hung....don't anyone dare to write here that "why the person/s implicated is/are not suing the foreign media for their 'stories'???"....keep up the PRESSURE!!!
NOW, Call in the ICJ!!!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 22
...
written by NSTPravda, April 09, 2009 20:30:14
Now, we done need to examine why
Altantuya really had to die
Just look at the hidden evidence
It’s as loud as a blast of ordnance
Before us, all we now have is sandiwara
So why does she have to die?
Only the real murderer knows why
Rules and laws here does not apply
Due processes? Some money will buy
Even holy Qu’ran was used to gainsay
Rigging courts and justice is semua-nya OK!
Rasuah saya sayang eh!
Dollar Akbar!
smilies/wink.gif smilies/wink.gif smilies/tongue.gif smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif smilies/shocked.gif
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 7
...
written by bknight, April 09, 2009 20:36:01
Guys, ICJ have no jurisdiction to receive this, International Court of Justice only hear cases of dispute between nations like the pulau batu putih case.
for crime against humanity, this case should go to International Criminal Court
http://www.icc-cpi.int/menus/icc/home
as i have posted in the other news, anyway i just want to share the information i got
Source : http://www.rnw.nl/internationa...-icc-qanda
What is the ICC?
The ICC is the world's first permanent, international tribunal that will try individuals responsible for the most serious international crimes and provide redress to victims when states are unable or unwilling to do so.
It was created when the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court ("Rome Statute") was adopted on 17 July 1998 at a diplomatic conference in Rome.
The court opened its doors on 1 July 2002. The ICC has 108 members states.
What crimes does the ICC prosecute?
The ICC prosecutes individuals accused of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity, all defined in the Rome Statute.
The Court will also have jurisdiction over the crime of aggression once a definition has been adopted by the Assembly of States Parties.
Is the Court able to prosecute individuals for crimes committed before the Court's establishment?
No. The Court has jurisdiction only over crimes committed after July 1, 2002, when the Rome Statute entered into force.
Who can be brought to trial before the ICC?
The Court does not have universal jurisdiction.
The Court exercises jurisdiction over serious international crimes only if they were committed on the territory of a state party or by one of its nationals.
These conditions however do not apply if a situation is referred to the Prosecutor by the United Nations Security Council, whose resolutions are binding on all UN member states, or if a State makes a declaration accepting the jurisdiction of the Court.
When can the Court prosecute an individual suspected of committing grave crimes under international law?
The Court may investigate and prosecute an individual when:
(a) the accused is a citizen of an ICC member state;
(b) the alleged crime took place on the territory of an ICC member state;
(c) the UN Security Council asks the ICC to open an investigation; or
(d) a country voluntarily accepts ICC jurisdiction.
Do people enjoy immunity from the court?
No. Everyone can be prosecuted: head of states, members of government or parliament or elected representatives or public officials.
Superiors or military commanders may be held responsible for criminal offences committed by persons under their command or control.
The ICC cannot prosecute persons who were under the age of 18 at the time a crime was allegedly committed.
When will the ICC investigate and prosecute crimes?
The ICC is a court of last resort.
It will only prosecute war crimes suspects when states are not able or are not willing to prosecute the most serious international crimes,
Bona fide efforts to discover the truth and to hold accountable those responsible for any acts of genocide, crimes against humanity, or war crimes will bar the ICC from proceeding.
Who can bring cases to the ICC?
The Prosecutor can start an investigation or prosecution in three different ways:
states Parties to the ICC can refer situations to the Prosecutor;
the United Nations Security Council can request the Prosecutor to launch an investigation;
the Prosecutor may start investigations when he receives reliable complaints by anyone. However, in this case, the Prosecutor must seek authorisation from three independent judges.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 4
...
written by bknight, April 09, 2009 20:36:39
Crime against humanity:
Source : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...t_humanity
In 2002, the International Criminal Court (ICC) was established in The Hague (Netherlands) and the Rome Statute provides for the ICC to have jurisdiction over genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. The definition of what is a "crime against humanity" for ICC proceedings has significantly broadened from its original legal definition or that used by the UN,[13] and Article 7 of the treaty stated that:
For the purpose of this Statute, "crime against humanity" means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack[14]:
(a) Murder;
(b) Extermination;
(c) Enslavement;
(d) Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
(e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law;
(f) Torture;
(g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;
(h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;
(i) Enforced disappearance of persons;
(j) The crime of apartheid;
(k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.
note (i) smilies/smiley.gif
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 6
...
written by kavidibaku, April 09, 2009 20:42:01
No one has seen their faces. They could be in Malaysia walking freely or have been sent to UK with tons of money. The two guys who will be hung could be any two innocent guys.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 20
...
written by Vincent, April 09, 2009 21:29:10
WHY ! why ! why ! why ! Y ! yyyyyyyyyyyyyyy .......It's a human being here , god damn it !!!!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 4
...
written by lvbala, April 09, 2009 21:40:03
Amazing Malaysian politician.... that is why!!!! smilies/angry.gif
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by talk2stop, April 09, 2009 22:49:47
Frankly, my dear I think Najib don't give a damn what is said what is about to say. Najib is like a slow driver you trying to overtake all day with a bumper sticker "If you think I am slow you are still behind me".
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 2
...
written by AlwaysFair, April 09, 2009 22:54:45
I only got 2 points to note:
1. Razak Baginda must be studying PHD on ," how to murder without leaving any trace."
2. Even the two murderers were to hang, they can always substitute with other condemned criminals, because their identity was protected with their faces covered all the time and nobody would be any wiser. If Altan...'s records can be wiped out at immigration, anything can happen in this corrupt-ridden govt.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 4
...
written by dassky2000, April 09, 2009 23:15:57
BETUL KAH DUA POLIS INI DI HUKUM GANTUNG SAMPAI MATI? MUKA MEREKA BERDUA INI TAK PERNAH TERDEDAH. SENTIASA TERTUTUP APABILA MASUK KELUAR MAKAMAH. MANA TAU, ADA ORANG GANTIAN UNTUK MEREKA BERDUA. ORANG LAIN DI GANTUNG SAMPAI MATI, DAN DUA POLIS INI DAPAT NEW IDENTITY DAN BERSARA DI LUAR NEGERI BERSAMA RAZAK BAGINDA??????????????????????????????????? YOU CAN'T SAY. MALAYSIA SEMUA PUN BOLEH BROTHER.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by A MI, April 09, 2009 23:18:09
Does all this matter anymore?
Sleepy could have had the real murders arrested but he didn't do anything.
He watched as the a*s-wipes work overtime.
There is royal backing.
Let us work on GE13. Build a good alternative party with a little less hot air.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 1
...
written by Parakang, April 09, 2009 23:20:16
RPK,
As we know today, the 2 cops will be hanged. Let me suggest this, send your message to them through their close family (as they hate you during your ISA detention in Sungai Buloh last year), convince them to give 'everything', let do collateral damage. They are going to die (maybe), but at least they left 'something' that can bring down the real culprit.
-To Parakang-
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 2
...
written by trublumalaysian, April 09, 2009 23:38:32
Hee haw & heave with all our might dear friends but; ultimately RB is having a wonderful intellectual sojourn in the english gardens of Oxford after all that has been done and said. Whether good, bad, evil, devious or whatever, UMNO is the purveyor of all things possible.
Malaysia boleh, yes?
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 1
...
written by ilovepakatan, April 10, 2009 00:25:14
WHY MACC is not investigating Perimekar? smilies/angry.gif Earning 100 over million for what kind of service? What kind of service deserve that kind of money? Let us know please so that we all can be rich too. MACC close one eye policy is continuing? Only left one eye to watch the opposition?
Maybe we should all collect a fund to hire Private Investigator and RPK to investigate this matter?
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0
...
written by Bradcrz, April 10, 2009 00:35:14
THE 2 COPS' FACES HV BEEN COVERED/SHIELDED ALL THE TIME.WHO WILL KNOW IF THEY R EVER GOIN TO B HANGED...THEY MAY REPLACED WTH OTHERS..??..GIVEN NEW IDENTITY..PASSPORTS...HAHA..CHAPTER CLOSED.. smilies/wink.gif
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0
Write comment
